Welcome to ChannelXML Community

Hello everyone,

For my first post here, I will give my feelings about the pilot podcast made by M. David and Kurt a few days ago.
businessman-First, I think this is a brilliant idea for a few reasons such as:

  • Bringing a great alternative to visually impaired people
  • Giving a chance to reduce more and more the gap between developers all around the planet. Voice carries a lot of information that you wouldn’t get through a written blog.
  • Being less annoying than just reading a long article about the same subject because it allows side notes on the spot and greater interactivity between the participants
  • Increase interactivity. While listening to the podcast, I found myself looking for resources suggested by Kurt.
  • Overall it brings a new dimension to technical discussions in a given field.

Now, regarding this particular podcast. M. David and Kurt discuss extensively (the podcast lasts 70 minutes or so) about the web industry and more specifically about the browser market. Considering Kurt’s position on the development of Netscape (Kurt is part of the Mercurial team which worked on Netscape 8), I couldn’t doubt about his extensive and wise knowledge of the field. What is more important, Kurt tries to step back and doesn’t sell his own baby. In fact he talks a lot of Opera and their great work on Opera 9. M. David is very nice leader of the podcast as he gives plenty of time to Kurt to set his views while being able to bounce back with the right questions at the right time, which is not surprising considering the great work M. David has pulled out in the past (e.g.: Saxon.NET, LLUP). I would strongly advise anyone to listen carefully at the podcast for a good historical overview of where the browser market stands right now and where it is likely to go in the coming few years.

Regarding the format, the podcast might be a bit long. Not long as in “boring-as-hell-maaate” but as in “so much content it’s hard to be able to focus on a few points to comment”. I discussed that issue with M. David and they plan to offer the podcast splitted into smaller pieces so that it is easier to refer to them. We also talked about a way to let people specify a range of the podcast themselves for reference. I also think the sound might need to be a little better but M. David said he would work on that for the next podcast.

I really believe this adds an outstanding value to the Web and I am really loooking forward the next podcast.

Enjoy it.

 

You Should Read...

GEEKY GIFTS EVERY NERD WILL GEEK OUT OVER

We always find ourselves with that one nerdy friend that we love and adore. From time to time, we may require to surprise them with gifts or a present. Getting the perfect gift for a nerdy or geek friend can be so fun and simple. Geeks are usually scientific and odd items. This is because they love very crazy, simple things that are easily available. Of course, you can pick also something more elegant like a gold rose for the ladies or a golf set for the gentlemen. Some of the best… READ MORE

Is the industry shooting itself in the foot?

There will be in France this week a vote at the French Assembly to pass a law, called Loi DADVSI. That law would be the implementation at the French level of an European directive made a few years back and called EUCD, to "harmonise certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society". Let alone the fact the directive was made in 2000/2001, a time when the Web was not spreaded as much as it is now, meaning that people couldn't foresee how the medium would have been… READ MORE

Linking to part of a resource

We had a question posted by sylvain: Last week I happened to drive for nearly 22 hours so I got time to let me brain go crazy. One question I asked myself was to find a way to be able to quote directly a resource passage. let me explain. Say you write a blog article which refers to another article or comment. Today you would only link to the URL pointing to that article or comment but you cannot state exactly what sentence you refer to. The classical way to do… READ MORE